<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Esther C Kane &#187; search engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://estherckane.com/tag/search-engines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://estherckane.com</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing / SEO - Tips, News and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:22:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>To Web Designers: Listen Up!</title>
		<link>http://estherckane.com/2010/10/to-web-designers-listen-up/</link>
		<comments>http://estherckane.com/2010/10/to-web-designers-listen-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eckweb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algorithims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canonicalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web designers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estherckane.com/?p=653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The great majority of websites that we get here at Eckweb are sites that have already been built and have already been online.  A great majority of those site owners claim that their web designer told them they know how to market their sites. I have no way of knowing if this is actually true [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The great majority of websites that we get here at <a href="http://www.eckweb.com" target="_blank">Eckweb</a> are sites that have already been built and have already been online.  A great majority of those site owners claim that their web designer told them they know how to market their sites.</p>
<p>I have no way of knowing if this is actually true or not but I do know that the websites, for the most part are in no way optimized or prepared for the search engines.  Some aren&#8217;t even ready for the public, but that&#8217;s another story!</p>
<p>After speaking and consulting with multiple designers over the years I do believe that there&#8217;s a sense of  &#8220;it&#8217;s not important&#8221; &#8211; from the designers&#8217; perspective.  Maybe I&#8217;m wrong, but I&#8217;m writing this post to once again emphasize how important every SEO factor truly is.</p>
<p><strong>It&#8217;s Not Just Me Saying This</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://searchengineland.com/consistency-is-king-in-seo-52171?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+searchengineland+%28Search+Engine+Land%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank">Here&#8217;s an excerpt by Adam Audette at SearchEngineLand.</a></p>
<div id="excerpts">We can think about SEO ranking elements as signals to a search  engine. Each one of them communicates something to the engine, and is  considered (or not) and applied to the internal algorithms. When all of  these signals are pointing in the same direction, powerful things can  happen.</p>
<p>This is especially well illustrated with the problem of duplicate  content and canonicalization. There are several ways sites can  communicate to the engines which URL is to be treated as the canonical,  including:</p>
<ul>
<li>301 redirects</li>
<li>XML sitemaps</li>
<li>rel canonical tags</li>
<li>Internal linking</li>
<li>External linking</li>
</ul>
<p>Think for a moment about a typical website. It is likely to have many  pages linking internally with multiple versions of URLs. The classic  home page problem, for example, where sites often link to both  mydomain.com and mydomain.com/index.html, is quite common. That doesn’t  begin to cover the potential duplication that occurs on the enterprise  level with large, complex websites and dynamic content.</p>
</div>
<p>This article speaks more about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonicalization" target="_blank">Canonicalization</a> issues but the take home message is the same.  The details of SEO are extremely important when it comes to marketing websites.  If there are 200 different ranking factors that Google takes into consideration, and your competitor has fulfilled 130 of them but your website has only fulfilled 70 of them.  Well, guess who&#8217;s going to rank higher?</p>
  
<div class="wp_license">
<p><a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/"><img src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/3.0//88x31.png" alt="Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported" class="alignleft" style="margin-top:4px;" />
</a>This work  is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported</a>.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://estherckane.com/2010/10/to-web-designers-listen-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparing Google and Bing Search Results</title>
		<link>http://estherckane.com/2009/07/comparing-google-and-bing-search-results/</link>
		<comments>http://estherckane.com/2009/07/comparing-google-and-bing-search-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eckweb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relevancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relevant searches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estherckane.com/?p=422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft&#8217;s new search engine Bing has been getting quite a bit of press lately and for good reason.  It&#8217;s the first search engine to present a real challenge to Google.  But, I can say anything I want, the proof is in the pudding (as they say) so I thought I would do a side by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft&#8217;s new search engine Bing has been getting quite a bit of press lately and for good reason.  It&#8217;s the first search engine to present a real challenge to Google.  But, I can say anything I want, the proof is in the pudding (as they say) so I thought I would do a side by side test between Google and Bing.  Let&#8217;s see what the results show.</p>
<p><strong>Keyword Phrase:</strong> <a title="Seo Services by Eckweb" href="http://www.eckweb.com" target="_blank">Seo Services</a></p>
<p>Google search results gave me 10 agencies that provide seo services<br />
Bing search results gave me 10 agencies that provide seo services</p>
<p><strong>Keyword Phrase:</strong> <a title="Name Tags" href="http://www.name-tags.net" target="_blank">Name Tags</a></p>
<p>Google search results gave me 7 companies that provide name tags<br />
Bing search results gave me 9 companies that provide name tags</p>
<p><strong>Keyword Phrase:</strong> <a title="South Florida Lawyer" href="http://www.adamslaw4men.com" target="_blank">South Florida Lawyer</a></p>
<p>Google search results gave me 8 South Florida law firms<br />
Bing search results gave me 9 South Florida law firms</p>
<p><strong>Keyword Phrase:</strong> <a title="Digital Imaging Services by Digital Pickle" href="http://www.digitalpickle.com" target="_blank">Digital Imaging Services</a></p>
<p>Google search results gave me 4 companies that provide digital imaging services<br />
Bing search results gave me 8 companies that provide digital imaging services</p>
<p><strong>Keyword Phrase:</strong> <a title="Denver Limousine Services by Exectran" href="http://www.exectran.com" target="_blank">Denver Limousine Services</a></p>
<p>Google search results gave me 8 companies that provide limousine services in Denver Colorado<br />
Bing search results gave me 9 companies that provide limousines services in Denver Colorado</p>
<p><strong>Keyword Phrase:</strong> <a title="Counseling Services in Atlanta at Karuna Counseling" href="http://www.karunacounseling.com" target="_blank">Counseling Services in Atlanta</a></p>
<p>Google search results gave me 7 listings of counseling centers in Atlanta Georgia<br />
Bing search results gave me 8 listings of counseling centers in Atlanta Georgia</p>
<p><strong>Keyword Phrase:</strong> <a title="Spiritual Life Coaching by Nancy Livingston" href="http://www.nancylivingston.com" target="_blank">Spiritual Life Coaching Services</a></p>
<p>Google search results gave me 10 listings of spiritual life coaches<br />
Bing search results gave me 8 listings of spiritual life coaches</p>
<p>So, out of 7 searches, the results are not so amazingly different.  Some of the search results were the same but most were not.  Although most of the time Bing brought back more relevant searches than Google, the differences were not that extraordinary.  In other words, it&#8217;s not as if Bing gave me double or more search results that were better than Google.  Bing just gave me 1 or 2 search results that were more relevant than Google.</p>
<p>Of course, this is only for 7 searches.  It would be interesting to run a sample with 100 or 1000 searches &#8211; I don&#8217;t have the time for that.  But I did want to see for myself if the commercials Bing.com puts out are true.  Maybe if they&#8217;re compared with other search engines, but when compared to Google, it&#8217;s not so different.</p>
<p>But, having said that.  It&#8217;s nice to have another search engine that does return relevant results.  Now I can do my searches on Google.com and Bing.com and I&#8217;ll know that I&#8217;ll be getting good relevant results for my time.  So, yes, Bing is the first search engine to really give Google a run!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://estherckane.com/2009/07/comparing-google-and-bing-search-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

